|
 As a special bonus to
Merck in all this, Dr. Gerberding has a wealth of contacts not merely throughout
the CDC, but also at the World Health Organization. When you're the former head
of the CDC, the top public health officials of the world are literally just one
call away. But starting today, that call is a commercial, corporate-sponsored
call, not a public health call. There's a huge difference.
Does Dr. Gerberding suffer from an "ethics deficiency?"
My question in all this is whether Dr. Gerberding has any real ethics when it
comes to issues like vaccines and public health. If she does have such ethics,
why would she accept a job with a company that has been engaged in outright
scientific fraud? (http://www.naturalnews.com/027582_M...)
Why would she go to work for a company that maintained a "hit list" of doctors
to attack and "neutralize?" This is true -- it came out in recent court
documents (http://www.naturalnews.com/027116_M...).
Why would she take a job with a company that has a pattern of threatening
doctors who speak out against its drugs? (http://www.naturalnews.com/026420_M...)
Why would she be okay with the idea of working for a company that commits
scientific fraud by hiding documents showing its drugs to be dangerous? (http://www.naturalnews.com/024072_Z...)
Why would she feel okay about working for a company that dumps chemicals and
vaccine waste products into the public water system? (http://www.naturalnews.com/023124_w...)
Why would she want to collect a paycheck from a company that has been caught
hiring ghost writers to pen "independent" science papers submitted to science
journals, when they were actually crafted by Merck? (http://www.naturalnews.com/023052_M...)
Why would she feel comfortable representing a company that committed blatant
scientific fraud with its Vytorin cholesterol drug study? (http://www.naturalnews.com/022485_s...)
Maybe Dr. Gerberding is fine with all this. Maybe she has really "flexible"
ethics. Or maybe she suffers from an "ethics deficiency" -- an epidemic disease
for which Merck apparently has no vaccine at all.
In any case, she's now allied herself with a company engaged in so many repeated
acts of fraud that in my opinion all its executives should be arrested and
prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Those executives will now include Dr.
Gerberding, it seems.
Did the CDC cover Merck's back?
You might say, though, that she hasn't done anything yet for Merck. But check
this out: As a previous NaturalNews story explains, when a fourteen-year-old
girl named Jessica died following a cervical cancer vaccine injection (made by
Merck), the CDC covered for Merck and pointed the finger at the girl's birth
control pills.
Care to guess who was heading the CDC at the time of this maneuver? Dr. Julie
Gerberding, now a top Merck executive.
You pat my back and I'll pat yours.
For years, under the lead of Dr. Gerberding, the CDC has maintained a rather
bizarre position that Merck's vaccines are so safe that all side effects should
be dismissed outright. This is explained in a Dallas Morning News article (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...),
among other places.
The CDC, in other words, has been running defense for Merck for many years,
downplaying vaccine side effects and insisting that Merck's vaccines are safe.
Now that the president of Merck's vaccine division and the former chief of the
CDC are one and the same, it brings up obvious questions of whether there was
some level of ongoing collusion between the CDC and Merck and how deeply Dr.
Gerberding might have been involved.
Some of the word games played by Dr. Gerberding demonstrate amazing Clintonian-like
speech patterns designed to deflect blame from Merck's vaccines. Listen to this
exchange where Dr. Gerberding indirectly admits that vaccines can cause autism
(or as she says, "Autism-like symptoms," which is exactly the same thing, as the
symptoms define the disease in the first place). Watch it yourself in this
segment on YouTube -- this is a must see video segment on the link between
vaccines and autism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh-n...
Who else is on the Merck team at the CDC?
That the CDC's chief would be offered one of the very top jobs at Merck now
makes me wonder just how deep the culture of collusion between Merck and the CDC
really goes. How many other CDC employees are in line for future job offers from
Merck -- and what might they do in order to win those jobs?
There's a solution to all this, of course: Pass a law that bans employees of the
CDC, FDA, FTC, EPA or USDA from ever working for pharmaceutical companies. The
people who run the regulatory agencies and public health offices should never be
allowed to leap into employment at the very same companies they were once
regulating. There's just too much risk of cross-contamination of influence,
which is why we have the corruption and collusion problems we're seeing today
with the FDA, FTC and CDC, all of which seem to be operating as marketing
extensions of the pharmaceutical industry.
As long as the revolving door remains wide open between Big Pharma and Big
Government, there will be a strong tendency towards corporate collusion that
betrays the people whom government is supposed to serve. Instead of our
government serving the People, in other words, it increasingly exists to serve
the interests of Big Business. And big business doesn't get much bigger than Big
Pharma.
After all, inventing fictitious disease, creating pandemic panics, then selling
questionable patented drugs to gullible consumers is a lucrative business model.
And now the official job of the former head of the CDC is to make sure it all
stays that way. So roll up your sleeves, folks: There's a vaccine with your name
on it, and Dr. Gerberding is here to make sure Merck sticks it to ya.
Sources for this story include:
http://www.naturalnews.com/023792_H...
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...
Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division
(opinion)
December, 2009
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
|
